telcos: the magic hard to understand , or some reflection of the hardships of policy at the crossroads of telecommunications
rumors of the cancellation of the President of UKE run in wide circles, on Saturday, even wrote about this paper Rzeczpospolita. Apparently in response government spokesman announced that the Government had no plans to dismiss Ms. President (Telepolis source. However, the official website of CPM such communication is missing. It remains, we'll see.
Though must admit that the lack of a clear signal of support by the Prime Minister UKE , with increasingly wider gossip, you may have bad effects on the same controller. But the regulator is not only the President, but the entire staff of officials, and they work better and more efficiently when they know that their boss leads them in the right direction and will lead. constant turmoil around the UKE (formerly URTiP URT PARR ...) does not contribute to the maintenance of expertise there, gaining experience and bringing together the experience of staff , the determined to modern regulations for competition, modeled on the more dynamic European countries (eg . Britain, Ireland ...).
the meantime I think myself that the case of telecommunications the politicians are not the simplest . Professionals in the industry much. Professionals with vision even less. Understanding this market requires not only good in the news orientacji technology, hermetic and difficult to understand the law applicable in this area, but historical knowledge about the realities of cables arranged in the ground, the capacity of wells, the possibilities of exchanges, access to long-term studies, changes in trends in Europe, and even the skills of divination, as this convergence will be.
Most experts working in the market, thereby tying up with one of the players. I guess that the policies of their "independent" advice can sometimes lose orientation. Particularly wary podchodziłbym the framework of good advice in the industry.
So how it all has to manage the policies? How to "check" whether the regulator is working fine? But it chose politics voters and that the voters will eventually be settled.
will put the idea that when it comes to telecommunications is a wise politician will evaluate the effective control over what you really feel the voters - that is, the first price of telephone calls. Secondly, the quality of services. Thirdly, diversity of supply. And after Fourth availability of this diverse offering.
it suggests that the measure of control was primarily a consumer satisfaction.
Theses posed by the TEPs that this short-term thinking that will mean dismissal and lack of investment włożyłbym the cartoons. Such fears French Lachy . The company wants to exist in this market can not afford to nieinwestowanie. For traditional telecom and their clients are waiting longer cable operators, and gamers who build radio networks. The latter simply wholesale leased lines and fiber optics in Poland is quite a lot and this number will certainly decrease
When it comes to cutting costs, so I think that underestimated the potential of a "blocked" out of spectrum or numbering that as a result of various past decisions, were assigned to different entities (yes, tepsie too). Often in excess, with the possibility of their use of services after years of detention. And companies pay to those frequencies and numbering resources just stick. Hold and lock, just that no one else did something else there. How will expire terms of the old decision, it just might be an interesting start to the war around the President of UKE.
I think it would have been in this war to win back consumer .
And what I think reading this blog:? because there is, I know from google analytics:)
0 comments:
Post a Comment